{rfName}
Ne

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Grant support

We acknowledge support of the European Research Council (RIBOMYLOME_309545) and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, 'Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2013-2017'.

Analysis of institutional authors

Botta-Orfila, TeresaAuthorMarti, StefanieAuthorTartaglia, Gian-GaetanoAuthor

Share

June 24, 2020
Publications
>
Letters

Neuronal intranuclear (hyaline) inclusion disease and fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome: a morphological and molecular dilemma

Publicated to:Brain. 140 E51-+ - 2017-08-01 140(), DOI: 10.1093/brain/awx156

Authors: Gelpi, E; Botta-Orfila, T; Bodi, L; Marti, S; Kovacs, G; Grau-Rivera, O; Lozano, M; Sánchez-Valle, R; Muñoz, E; Valldeoriola, F; Pagonabarraga, J; Tartaglia, GG; Milà, M

Affiliations

Barcelona Inst Sci & Technol, CRG, Dr Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain - Author
Biobanc Hosp Clin IDIBAPS, Neurol Tissue Bank, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Genet, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Barcelona, Movement Disorders Unit, Neurol Dept, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Clin Barcelona, Neurol Dept, Alzheimers Dis & Other Cognit Disorders Unit, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Hosp Germans Trias I Pujol, Neurol Dept, Badalona, Spain - Author
Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Neurol Dept, Barcelona, Spain - Author
ICREA, Barcelona, Spain - Author
Med Univ Vienna, Inst Neurol, Vienna, Austria - Author
Univ Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Keywords

AtaxiaCell nucleus inclusion bodyCytomegalovirus infectionCytomegalovirus infectionsDegenerative diseaseFragile x associated tremor ataxia syndromeFragile x mental retardation proteinFragile x syndromeGenetic screeningHumanHumansHyalinIncidental findingIntranuclear inclusion bodiesLetterNerve degenerationNeurodegenerationNeurodegenerative diseasesNeuronal intranuclear inclusion diseasePremutationPriority journalSequestosome 1Syndrome fxtasTranslationTremorTremor ataxia syndromeUbiquitin

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Brain due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2017, it was in position 6/197, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Clinical Neurology. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 1.52. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-08-02, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 43
  • Scopus: 26

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-08-02:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 29.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 27 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 3.

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Austria.